In Texas, motorcycles are perfectly legal to operate on public roadsâeven highwaysâwithout roll cages, seat belts, or even four wheels.
Meanwhile, a modern UTV with:
â
Turn signals
â
Mirrors
â
Headlights and brake lights
â
Seat belts
â
A roll cage
â
Insurance
â
A licensed, trained driver
...can still be stopped, fined, or impounded simply because of the label on the title: Off-Highway Vehicle.
Let that sink in.
A rider on a motorcycle doing 45 MPH on a rural road is legal.
A side-by-side doing the same speed on the same roadâwith more safety featuresâis illegal.
Itâs not about capability.
Itâs not about equipment.
Itâs about a law thatâs stuck in time.
The ATV and UTV community isnât asking for special treatment. Weâre asking for the same treatment other vehicles already receive when they:
Meet safety standards
Are insured and registered
Are driven by licensed operators
If motorcycles can be trusted on public roads, then so can ATVsâwith equal responsibility, and equal respect.
When people hear âATV,â they often think of a barebones trail machine. But todayâs UTVs (side-by-sides) are more like compact, low-speed carsâbuilt with protection and stability in mind.
Hereâs how they stack up against motorcycles on key safety features:
Motorcycles: No frame protection, exposed seating, high rollover risk in turns or at low speeds
UTVs: Full steel roll cage, side panels, seating inside the vehicle frame
âĄď¸ In the event of a crash or rollover, UTV riders are far more protected from impact.
Motorcycles: No seat belts; rider must rely on balance and experience
UTVs: 3-point or 4-point seat belts standard in most models, with padded seats and harness options
âĄď¸ UTVs keep riders secured in the vehicle, reducing ejection and serious injury.
Motorcycles: Smaller profile, easily lost in blind spots
UTVs: Wider base, larger front/rear profiles, visible LED lighting, and side marker lights
âĄď¸ UTVs are easier for drivers to see, especially at night or in traffic.
Motorcycles: Basic headlights, turn signals (often aftermarket), limited rear lighting
UTVs: Full lighting systemsâbrake lights, turn signals, daytime running lights, and backup lights in many models
âĄď¸ UTVs often exceed the basic requirements for visibility and signaling.
Motorcycles: 2 wheels, balance-based control, high risk on wet or gravel roads
UTVs: 4-wheel stability, low center of gravity, traction control, and power steering
âĄď¸ UTVs offer a more stable ride, especially in rough or rural environments.
In every category where safety matters, UTVs meet or beat the performance of motorcyclesâyet theyâre still treated like unsafe toys.
Itâs not just unfair.
Itâs untrue.
To a lot of people, ATVs still carry the reputation of being reckless trail toys. And honestly, that reputation isnât entirely undeservedâfrom decades ago.
Back then, most ATVs were built for rough terrain and nothing else. They had no lights, no mirrors, no safety cages, and no rules. But times have changed, and so have the machines.
Unfortunately, the public image hasnât caught up.
Many lawmakers, enforcement officers, and even fellow drivers still picture:
A muddy trail machine skidding through fields
Loud pipes and no plates
Riders with no gear, tearing up shoulders and ignoring traffic
But thatâs not the kind of rider weâre talking aboutâand thatâs not what this bill is about.
This bill is about the modern, road-ready ATV and UTV community, which now includes:
Retired folks in rural areas who ride to town safely
Tradespeople using side-by-sides for local job runs
Families using UTVs for short trips within their neighborhoods
Young riders who can legally operate a motorcycle but not their safer side-by-side
These are licensed, insured, and equipped ridersâand yet theyâre still lumped in with a stereotype that no longer fits.
We wouldnât ban all motorcycles because a few people ride recklessly.
We shouldnât keep banning ATVs because some people used to.
This isnât about erasing the past. Itâs about recognizing the presentâand planning for the future.
Across the United States, more and more states have realized what Texas hasnât: modern ATVs and UTVs can safely share the roadâif the law makes space for them.
Places like Utah, Arizona, Montana, Idaho, and many others already allow registered, road-equipped ATVs on public roads, often with fewer restrictions than what the 50 MPH Bill proposes. And guess what?
Their roads arenât any less safe.
Their law enforcement isnât overwhelmed.
Their riders arenât out of control.
In fact, many of these states have seen:
đ Economic growth in rural towns
đ¨ Safer riding practices due to legal clarity
đŽ Better cooperation between riders and officers
đ ď¸ More businesses investing in ATV safety inspections and gear
If it works in those placesâwith fewer people, smaller tax bases, and less road infrastructureâwhatâs stopping Texas from doing the same?
We have more land, more riders, more small towns, and more opportunity to get this right. We just need to match the law to reality.
Itâs not about lowering standards. Itâs about raising expectationsâand finally letting responsible ATV and UTV riders earn their place on the road.
The heart of this argument comes down to one simple truth:
The current law isnât based on safety. Itâs based on stigma.
It assumes that just because a vehicle was originally designed for off-road use, it canât be safe, canât be legal, and shouldnât be trusted on pavementâno matter what equipment, training, or precautions the rider takes.
That mindset ignores:
The evolution of modern machines
The data on safety and crash survivability
The responsibility of the people behind the wheel
The law trusts a 600-pound motorcycle with no seat belt and two points of tire contact at 70 MPH. But it wonât trust a four-wheeled, belt-secured, roll cageâprotected UTV doing 35 MPH to the feed store?
Thatâs not public safety.
Thatâs a policy contradiction.
We're not saying motorcycles should be banned. Far from it. We believe in equal access, earned by equal responsibility. And if a motorcycle rider can meet those standards and be welcomed on the road, a properly equipped ATV or UTV rider should be too.
This isnât about changing the rules for one group.
Itâs about ending the double standard.
Because if a machine thatâs smaller, lighter, and less stable is legal to rideâthen itâs time Texas stopped pretending that ATVs are the problem.
Itâs the law thatâs behind.
Not the riders.